Product Benchmark & Comparison

Position your sunscreen against market leaders thanks to a multidimensional evaluation combining sensory, emotional, and behavioral aspects.

The client issue

A dermocosmetic laboratory is launching a and must position it against the market’s 3 leaders before launch.nouvelle formule SPF50+

Beyond UV efficacy (already validated in the lab), the brand wants to understand how its product compares in terms of: texture, absorption, comfort, white residue, etc.expérience d'usage réelle

Identified challenges

  • Identify strengths and weaknesses vs competitors
  • Quantify the comparative sensory experience
  • Validate the price/perceived quality positioning
  • Generate differentiating claims for the launch
Sun Care Benchmark

Comparative test under real conditions

200Participants
4Countries
21Days
4Tested products

Targeted Sun Care Recruitment

Regular users of SPF50+ sun protection, varied profiles.

🇫🇷France50 participants
🇺🇸United States50 participants
🇧🇷Brazil50 participants
🇦🇺Australia50 participants

Blind Comparative Design

Sequential monadic test with product rotation.

01

Baseline

Reference measurements at rest to establish individual baseline levels

02

Lab application

Controlled sensory evaluation: texture, spreadability, absorption, residue

03

Real use (7 days)

Daily application in real-world conditions with logbook

04

Comparative evaluation

Final preference ranking + conversational avatar for verbatims

05

Price test

Conjoint analysis of price/benefits to validate the pricing position

A multimodal arsenal

Sensory Evaluation

Complete sensory profile by descriptor.

Texture Absorption Residual comfort

Competitive Mapping

Relative positioning vs the competition.

Strengths/weaknesses Ranking

Conjoint Analysis

Price/benefit optimization.

Acceptable price Willingness to pay

Conversational Avatar

AI-guided interview to collect stated perceptions.

Overall satisfaction Repurchase intention

A complete competitive mapping

#1 on the criterion "application comfort" against the 3 leaders

Texture & Spreadability

#1

Significantly higher score on fluidity and ease of spreading vs all competitors (p<0.01).

Absorption

#2

Second place, very close to the leader. Improvement point identified for V2.

White residue

#1

Best score: 91% of participants perceive no white residue after application.

Value for money

Optimal

Acceptable price identified at €18.90 — 12% above the main competitor.

Market variations

🇫🇷

France

Preference#1
NPS+62
🇧🇷

Brazil

PreferenceNo. 1
NPS+71
🇦🇺

Australia

PreferenceNo. 2
NPS+54

Claims ready for launch

Validated

"No. 1 Texture vs. market leaders"

Blind test, 200 participants, 4 countries (p<0.01)

Validated

"Zero white residue for 9 out of 10 users"

91% with no perceived residue, real-life conditions, 4 skin phototypes

Validated

"Superior application comfort"

Hedonic score +28% vs. main competitor

Validated

"Preferred by consumers"

No. 1 in overall preference across 3 of 4 markets

Launching a new product?

Position it against the competition with robust scientific data.

We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By continuing to browse, you agree to our use of cookies.

Manage your cookie preferences

Essential cookies
Necessary for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.
Analytics cookies
Help us understand how you use the site.
Marketing cookies
Used to provide you with relevant ads.