CarClinic: Vehicle User Experience

Evaluate your vehicle's ergonomics, design, and ease of use through onboard eye-tracking and instrumented usage tests.

The Client's Challenge

An automaker is preparing to launch a new electric SUV and must validate the user experience of its cabin before mass production.

The digital interface (central screen, instrument cluster, voice controls) is a major selling point but feedback from internal tests is contradictory. Objective data is needed.

The identified challenges

  • Measure the interface's true intuitiveness
  • Identify ergonomic friction points
  • Compare the "premium" perception vs competitors
  • Validate ease of use from the very first interaction
Electric SUV cockpit

Instrumented usage tests in real-world conditions

120Drivers
3Countries
28Days
3Vehicles compared

Target Drivers

Potential buyer profiles for premium electric SUVs.

🇫🇷France40 drivers
🇩🇪Germany40 drivers
🇺🇸United States40 drivers

Recruitment criteria

  • Owners or intenders of premium SUVs (>€45k)
  • Current combustion/electric mix
  • B+ license for 5+ years
  • Moderately to highly tech-savvy

Embedded Eye-Tracking + Usage Tests

ET glasses + cockpit cameras + handling sensors.

01

Baseline

Reference measurements at rest to establish individual baseline levels

02

Free exploration

5 minutes of free exploration of the cabin with eye-tracking

03

Guided tasks

12 predefined tasks: GPS, air conditioning, music, seats, etc.

04

Road course

30 min of real driving with continuous measurements

05

AI avatar debrief

In-depth qualitative interview on the lived experience

Full cockpit instrumentation

Embedded Eye-Tracking

Precise mapping of gaze across each area of the cabin: screen, mirrors, controls, road.

Attention zonesEyes/road timeVisual search

Completion Time

Time to complete each task: indicator of intuitiveness.

Time per taskSuccess rate

Satisfaction & Premium

Perceived quality and premium positioning.

Premium scoreCompetitor comparison

Conversational Avatar

Qualitative verbatims on the driving experience.

Points of friction"Wow moments"

Complete UX mapping

94% of task success rate on the first attempt

GPS Navigation

12s

Average time to set a destination: 12 seconds, vs 23s for competitor A and 31s for B.

Air conditioning

Attention

18% of users look for a physical button. Identified friction point: all-touch is insufficient.

Premium perception

No. 1

Premium score higher than the benchmark German competitor (+8 points on the perception scale).

Eyes/road ratio

Compliant

Average time eyes off road: 1.2s per interaction, within NHTSA standards (<2s).

Market variations

🇫🇷

France

Satisfaction8.6/10
PremiumNo. 1
🇩🇪

Germany

Satisfaction8.2/10
PremiumNo. 2
🇺🇸

United States

Satisfaction8.8/10
PremiumNo. 1

UX optimization plan

Validated

"Most intuitive interface in its category"

94% task success rate, completion time -45% vs competition

Recommendation

Add a physical climate control shortcut

Dedicated rotary button to reduce "eyes off road"

Validated

"Superior premium perception"

No. 1 vs German competition in 2 out of 3 markets

Compliant

NHTSA visual safety validated

Eyes off road time <2s for all interactions

Are you developing a new vehicle?

Let's validate the user experience of your cabin together.

We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By continuing to browse, you agree to our use of cookies.

Manage your cookie preferences

Essential cookies
Necessary for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.
Analytics cookies
Help us understand how you use the site.
Marketing cookies
Used to provide you with relevant ads.